找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
总共850条微博

动态微博

查看: 16328|回复: 27
打印 上一主题 下一主题
收起左侧

[ztzt]Big Bang,今天诞生了个诺贝尔奖[;)](图)

[复制链接]

1852

主题

4万

帖子

92万

积分

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-3-18 05:58:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式


 


Evidence spotted for universe's early growth spurt

By MALCOLM RITTER 
AP Science Writer


NEW YORK (AP) -- Researchers say they have spotted evidence that a split-second after the Big Bang, the newly formed universe ballooned out at a pace so astonishing that it left behind ripples in the fabric of the cosmos.

If confirmed, experts said, the discovery would be a major advance in the understanding of the early universe. Although many scientists already believed that an initial, extremely rapid growth spurt happened, they have long sought the type of evidence cited in the new study.

The results reported Monday emerged after researchers peered into the faint light that remains from the Big Bang of nearly 14 billion years ago.

The discovery "gives us a window on the universe at the very beginning," when it was far less than one-trillionth of a second old, said theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss of Arizona State University, who was not involved in the work.

"It's just amazing," Krauss said. "You can see back to the beginning of time."

Marc Kamionkowski, a theoretical physicist at Johns Hopkins University who did not participate in the research, said the finding is "not just a home run. It's a grand slam."

He and other experts said the results must be confirmed by other observations, a standard caveat in science.

Right after the Big Bang, the universe was a hot soup of particles. It took about 380,000 years to cool enough that the particles could form atoms, then stars and galaxies. Billions of years later, planets formed from gas and dust that were orbiting stars. The universe has continued to spread out.

Krauss said he thinks the new results could rank among the greatest breakthroughs in astrophysics over the last 25 years, such as the Nobel prize-winning discovery that the universe's expansion is accelerating.

Monday's findings were announced by a collaboration that included researchers from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the University of Minnesota, Stanford University, the California Institute of Technology and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The team plans to submit its conclusions to a scientific journal this week, said its leader, John Kovac of Harvard.

Astronomers scanned about 2 percent of the sky for three years with a telescope at the South Pole, where the air is exceptionally dry.

They were looking for a specific pattern in light waves within the faint microwave glow left over from the Big Bang. The pattern has long been considered evidence of rapid growth, known as inflation. Kovac called it "the smoking-gun signature of inflation."

The reported detection suggests that "inflation has sent us a telegram," Kamionkowski said.

The researchers say the light-wave pattern was caused by gravitational waves, which are ripples in space and time. If verified, the new work would be the first detection of such waves from the birth of the universe, which have been called the first tremors of the Big Bang.

Krauss cautioned that the light-wave pattern might not be a sign of inflation, although he stressed that it's "extremely likely" that it is. The pattern is "our best hope" for a direct test of whether the rapid growth spurt happened, he said.

Alan Guth of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a creator of the idea of inflation, said the findings already suggest that some ideas about the rapid expansion of the universe can be ruled out.

It had not been clear whether the light-wave pattern would be detectable even if inflation really happened, he said, but luckily "nature is cooperating with us, laying out its cards in a way that we can see them."




http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26605974

Cosmic inflation: 'Spectacular' discovery hailed

By Jonathan AmosScience correspondent, BBC News

Scientists say they have extraordinary new evidence to support a Big Bang Theory for the origin of the Universe.

Researchers believe they have found the signal left in the sky by the super-rapid expansion of space that must have occurred just fractions of a second after everything came into being.

It takes the form of a distinctive twist in the oldest light detectable with telescopes.

The work will be scrutinised carefully, but already there is talk of a Nobel.

"This is spectacular," commented Prof Marc Kamionkowski, from Johns Hopkins University.

"I've seen the research; the arguments are persuasive, and the scientists involved are among the most careful and conservative people I know," he told BBC News.

The breakthrough was announced by an American team working on a project known as BICEP2.

This has been using a telescope at the South Pole to make detailed observations of a small patch of sky.

The aim has been to try to find a residual marker for "inflation" - the idea that the cosmos experienced an exponential growth spurt in its first trillionth, of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second.

Gravitational waves from inflation put a distinctive twist pattern in the polarisation of the CMB

Theory holds that this would have taken the infant Universe from something unimaginably small to something about the size of a marble. Space has continued to expand for the nearly 14 billion years since.

Inflation was first proposed in the early 1980s to explain some aspects of Big Bang Theory that appeared to not quite add up, such as why deep space looks broadly the same on all sides of the sky. The contention was that a very rapid expansion early on could have smoothed out any unevenness.

But inflation came with a very specific prediction - that it would be associated with waves of gravitational energy, and that these ripples in the fabric of space would leave an indelible mark on the oldest light in the sky -the famous Cosmic Microwave Background.

The BICEP2 team says it has now identified that signal. Scientists call it B-mode polarisation. It is a characteristic twist in the directional properties of the CMB. Only the gravitational waves moving through the Universe in its inflationary phase could have produced such a marker. It is a true "smoking gun".

Speaking at the press conference to announce the results, Prof John Kovac of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and a leader of the BICEP2 collaboration, said: "This is opening a window on what we believe to be a new regime of physics - the physics of what happened in the first unbelievably tiny fraction of a second in the Universe."

Completely astounded

The signal is reported to be quite a bit stronger than many scientists had dared hope. This simplifies matters, say experts. It means the more exotic models for how inflation worked are no longer tenable.

The results also constrain the energies involved - at 10,000 trillion gigaelectronvolts. This is consistent with ideas for what is termed Grand Unified Theory, the realm where particle physicists believe three of the four fundamental forces in nature can be tied together.

But by associating gravitational waves with an epoch when quantum effects were so dominant, scientists are improving their prospects of one day pulling the fourth force - gravity itself - into a Theory of Everything.

The sensational nature of the discovery means the BICEP2 data will be subjected to intense peer review.

It is possible for the interaction of CMB light with dust in our galaxy to produce a similar effect, but the BICEP2 group says it has carefully checked its data over the past three years to rule out such a possibility.

Other experiments will now race to try to replicate the findings. If they can, a Nobel Prize seems assured for this field of research.

Who this would go to is difficult to say, but leading figures on the BICEP2 project and the people who first formulated inflationary theory would be in the running.

One of those pioneers, Prof Alan Guth from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told the BBC: "I have been completely astounded. I never believed when we started that anybody would ever measure the non-uniformities of the CMB, let alone the polarisation, which is now what we are seeing.

"I think it is absolutely amazing that it can be measured and also absolutely amazing that it can agree so well with inflation and also the simplest models of inflation - nature did not have to be so kind and the theory didn't have to be right."

British scientist Dr Jo Dunkley, who has been searching through data from the European Planck space telescope for a B-mode signal, commented: "I can't tell you how exciting this is. Inflation sounds like a crazy idea, but everything that is important, everything we see today - the galaxies, the stars, the planets - was imprinted at that moment, in less than a trillionth of a second. If this is confirmed, it's huge."

"Everything we see today - the galaxies, the stars, the planets - was imprinted at that moment"


http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2014/03/17/290862157/a-new-window-on-the-big-bang-has-been-opened

A New Window On The Big Bang Has Been Opened

by ADAM FRANK

March 17, 201412:33 PM
CorrectionMarch 17, 2014

A previous version of this post incorrectly referred to a decimal point with 35 zeros after it. The correct number of zeros is 34.

The BICEP2 telescope at twilight, which occurs only twice a year at the South Pole.

Steffen Richter/Harvard University

It's not every day that a new window on the birth of the universe is thrown open. It's not every day that human beings get the chance to leap into the void and have their conceptions of space and time stretched to the limits. It's not every day that we see the wildest dreams of scientists realized, written into the fabric of space and time and light.

Today appears to be one of those days.

The Big Bang has been the dominant theory explaining the history of the universe for more than a half-century. But puzzles inherent in the idea (and in the data) led to a major addition to the theory in the 1980s: inflationary cosmology. Since then inflation, as it is called, has been a sometimes contentious but stalwart pillar of our cosmic understanding. To get inflation on solid scientific ground however meant finding ways to see farther back in time than ever before.

And that is what has been announced today.

To understand the importance of today's discovery (Nobel worthy?) you are going to have to think small ... very, very small. You must wrap your mind around the most tiny, itsy-bitsy, sliver-o-licious, hyper-minuscule fraction of a second you have ever considered in your whole life.

Try saying this out loud: One hundred million, billion, billion, billion-th of a second after the moment of creation.

That's what we are talking about. That's what the kind folks at BICEP2 may have given us (it will need to be confirmed, of course).

It is an indirect view of the universe at approximately one hundred million, billion, billion, billion-th of a second after it was born. Written mathematically, that is 10-35 of a second or a decimal point with 34 zeros after it, which looks like this:

T = 0.00000000000000000000000000000000001 second

For comparison, when it you mistakenly grab a hot tea kettle it takes a full 0.01 second for the electrical signal screaming "DROP IT!" to run from your hand to your brain.

We are talking about a very, very, very young universe.

Which finally brings us back to the importance of today's monumental discovery. In the 1980s, Big Bang theory got a major upgrade with the addition of  Back then paradoxes and puzzles kept popping up which threatened to topple the Big Bang. Scientists like Alan Guth realized that, in order to make the idea work, there must have been a brief moment very early in cosmic history when a little sliver of post-Big Bang space-time began expanding much faster than its surroundings. Like an inflating balloon blown up by a high-powered compressor, this tiny "pocket" of space-time stretched very, very quickly to become our entire observable universe.

But almost as rapidly as it began, this period of inflation ended and left us with what we have now: the leisurely expansion we see today. In spite of its brevity, this brief period of Inflation was all-important. It was inflation that set us on the trajectory for everything that has happened afterward: galaxies, stars, planets and us.

The bottom part of this illustration shows the scale of the universe versus time. Specific events are shown such as the formation of neutral Hydrogen at 380,000 years after the big bang. Prior to this time, the constant interaction between matter (electrons) and light (photons) made the universe opaque.

BICEP2

But inflation was a contentious idea from start. No one had a firm handle on what the universe was like at such a ridiculously early point in time. The densities and temperatures of cosmic matter were so high that its physics could only be drawn in outlines. While inflation cured many problems for cosmologists, it seemed to lots of researchers like wishful thinking written in advanced math.

Where was the proof?

Over the last few decades a slim kind of proof for inflation arrived via tiny bumps and lumps in the ancient cosmic gas that can be directly observed through what's called the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation. The CMB is made of fossil photons left over from the period just 300,000 years after the Big Bang. Lumps and bumps in the density of gas can be traced all the way back to quantum mechanical burps that occurred during inflation. But there are many versions of inflation theory and the proof that came from the density wiggles did not tell us which version was correct or provide many details about the early, early universe. In other words the density wiggles were a blunt instrument.

Space-time wiggles, though, are another story entirely.

The violence of the early universe was so extreme that it would leave space-time itself ringing like a bell. Almost as soon as inflation was proposed some scientists predicted that it would leave a "gravity wave" signature.

Ripples in the fabric of space-time are an essential prediction of Einstein's theory of relativity. While we have never captured a gravity wave directly, we already have indirect proof of their existence by watching how pairs of orbiting pulsars (dead hyper-dense stars) spiral around each other.

Thus more than two decades ago physicists were predicting the existence of a gravity wave signature for the inflationary epoch. Even more important, by looking at which gravity waves got the most energy scientists could cut through different versions of inflation theory. They could even tell if inflation itself was entirely wrong since there are alternative models for the early universe that don't involve inflation and make different predictions for the gravity wave spectrum.

So gravity waves are the key. If we could see them (directly or indirectly, as BICEP has done) they would represent a way to distinguish between different models for the early universe. And comparing data with models — that is what science is all about, after all.

Even on its own, finding new evidence for Einstein's much-sought-after gravity waves is a major achievement. But finding evidence for them from the early universe means we have a new tool for exploring the most extreme, mind-blowing event that ever occurred: the birth of everything. Today it seems that evidence may have been found.




 

 

  本贴由[大清太平]最后编辑于:2014-3-17 22:1:22  

回复

使用道具 举报

978

主题

2万

帖子

35万

积分

沙发
发表于 2014-3-18 06:03:15 | 只看该作者

没有注意憋气,出现涟漪了,这宇宙搞摄影不行


  没有注意憋气,出现涟漪了,这宇宙搞摄影不行





---
 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

614

主题

9189

帖子

14万

积分

板凳
发表于 2014-3-18 06:10:47 | 只看该作者

还真给抓到了,漂亮。[:-Q][:-Q][:-Q](图)


 漂亮!



 
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

614

主题

9189

帖子

14万

积分

地板
发表于 2014-3-18 06:22:10 | 只看该作者

不会是 snap shot 吧?!要不,俺怎么没有拍到?[:-K][:-K][:-K]


  不会是 snap shot 吧?!要不,俺怎么没有拍到?




回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

95

主题

3268

帖子

6万

积分

5#
发表于 2014-3-18 06:35:15 | 只看该作者

三GG的微距跟不上了?[:-K]


  三GG的微距跟不上了?




回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

229

主题

1万

帖子

28万

积分

6#
发表于 2014-3-18 07:08:42 | 只看该作者

原来又是个找证据的东东[:-Q]


 34个0?


 

---
 
拜晴MM所赐, 帅
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1852

主题

4万

帖子

92万

积分

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-3-18 07:35:19 | 只看该作者

也武装一个那样的相机,放南极上去[:-K]


  也武装一个那样的相机,放南极上去





---



回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

614

主题

9189

帖子

14万

积分

8#
发表于 2014-3-18 07:58:17 | 只看该作者

如果这个相机(或摄像机)对焦于空间一个极小区域,景深应该是无穷大。那么,


 如果在其狭窄的光路某处附近有两个,或两个以上周期性出现的大质量星体,它们各自的引力波正好在所摄的光通道里发生干涉呢?


 

 

  本贴由[salmonfish]最后编辑于:2014-3-18 0:6:53  
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

614

主题

9189

帖子

14万

积分

9#
发表于 2014-3-18 08:04:42 | 只看该作者

也就是说,换一个方向,或换一个区域,如果还能观察到这种干涉,似乎就更能说明问题了。对吗?


  也就是说,换一个方向,或换一个区域,如果还能观察到这种干涉,似乎就更能说明问题了。对吗?




回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

900

主题

1万

帖子

16万

积分

10#
发表于 2014-3-18 08:40:17 | 只看该作者

不明觉厉 [:-Q]


  不明觉厉





---
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

614

主题

9189

帖子

14万

积分

11#
发表于 2014-3-19 02:01:41 | 只看该作者

查了一下,原来“不明觉厉” 就是“瞎起哄”嘛!还有“喜大普奔”呢。[:-Q][:-Q][:-K]


  查了一下,原来“不明觉厉” 就是“瞎起哄”嘛!还有“喜大普奔”呢。




回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1852

主题

4万

帖子

92万

积分

12#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-3-19 06:51:39 | 只看该作者

这当然不是光学波段的相机,似应为测宇宙的微波背景CMB,其带有宇宙形成之初的信息,所以是微波接收机吧


当然啦,在南半球的南极上看到的,应该只是宇宙的一部分。
是不是在别的星空能再现,似乎不是最重要的,需要别的类似但原理不一样的仪器也能看到,就大功告成。网上的材料表明,
当然国际上、甚至于美国国内,都有多个竞争性的团队,也做这个,哈佛的这一队一年前就有了初步结果,也许
大约别的团队也快出结果了,所以不能再等、再推敲、再验证了


 

---



回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

614

主题

9189

帖子

14万

积分

13#
发表于 2014-3-19 07:01:34 | 只看该作者

俺说的光可以是全光谱上的任一段,不是狭义的可见光。微波也是光。


  俺说的光可以是全光谱上的任一段,不是狭义的可见光。微波也是光。




回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

614

主题

9189

帖子

14万

积分

14#
发表于 2014-3-19 07:07:15 | 只看该作者

宇宙的微波背景CMB噪音不是早就被证明了吗?(而且CMB在宇宙处处相等)


  宇宙的微波背景CMB噪音不是早就被证明了吗?(而且CMB在宇宙处处相等)




回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

614

主题

9189

帖子

14万

积分

15#
发表于 2014-3-19 07:10:44 | 只看该作者

把俺卖了也买不起一个那样的相机。算了,还是玩俺的泥坑吧。


  把俺卖了也买不起一个那样的相机。算了,还是玩俺的泥坑吧。




回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1852

主题

4万

帖子

92万

积分

16#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-3-19 08:20:16 | 只看该作者

这回测的是CMB的极化特性B-mode,据称只有重力波才能产生,因此提供了重力波存在的新证据


而这次测的引起B-mode的重力波,和你所说的由于大质量星体运动导致光线弯曲的那种重力波不同。后者
出现在较年轻的宇宙,前者是Big Bang的最初那个Bang的时候出现。观测上,前者是个比较小尺度的视角上看到,
而这次所见的有3°左右的视角,很大,和前者是不一样的特征。


 

---



回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1852

主题

4万

帖子

92万

积分

17#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-3-19 08:25:49 | 只看该作者

受教了,学了两新成语[:-K]


  受教了,学了两新成语





---



回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

614

主题

9189

帖子

14万

积分

18#
发表于 2014-3-19 19:26:30 | 只看该作者

俺的小学老师怎么没有教过俺“CMB的极化特性B-mode”?[:-K][:-K][:-Q][:-Q]


  俺的小学老师怎么没有教过俺“CMB的极化特性B-mode”?




回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1852

主题

4万

帖子

92万

积分

19#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-3-19 20:58:30 | 只看该作者

纠正一下中文,免得挨砖[:-K]。中文应该叫引力波,中文的重力波另有所指


BBC看来还不如俺半吊子来得专业,新闻稿中全篇都用gravity waves,
这是重大失误,应该叫gravitational waves。


 

---



回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

229

主题

1万

帖子

28万

积分

20#
发表于 2014-3-19 21:04:33 | 只看该作者

俺今天开车听NPR说这事儿,科普的不错,俺也觉得需要重上小学[:>]


  俺今天开车听NPR说这事儿,科普的不错,俺也觉得需要重上小学





---
 
拜晴MM所赐, 帅
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

229

主题

1万

帖子

28万

积分

21#
发表于 2014-3-19 21:07:19 | 只看该作者

见过“不明觉厉”, 不知道“喜大普奔”是啥东东[:-K]


网络改变了生活,俺决定多用网络成语,不卖糕了,

 

---
 
拜晴MM所赐, 帅
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

218

主题

6793

帖子

4万

积分

22#
发表于 2014-3-20 05:30:11 | 只看该作者

Big Bang有没有中文译名?


  Big Bang有没有中文译名?





---


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

229

主题

1万

帖子

28万

积分

23#
发表于 2014-3-20 05:40:17 | 只看该作者

大爆炸[:-K]


  大爆炸





---
 
拜晴MM所赐, 帅
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

218

主题

6793

帖子

4万

积分

24#
发表于 2014-3-20 05:48:15 | 只看该作者

好![:-Q]


  好!





---


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

900

主题

1万

帖子

16万

积分

25#
发表于 2014-3-20 07:02:45 | 只看该作者

盘古开天地 - 五个字,好像有点长


  盘古开天地 - 五个字,好像有点长





---
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

218

主题

6793

帖子

4万

积分

26#
发表于 2014-3-21 05:07:58 | 只看该作者

大猫GG这个翻译很形象!


  大猫GG这个翻译很形象!





---


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1852

主题

4万

帖子

92万

积分

27#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-3-23 02:13:12 | 只看该作者

正解[:-Q]


  正解





---



回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1852

主题

4万

帖子

92万

积分

28#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-3-23 02:14:34 | 只看该作者

文学青年洋洋洒洒下笔千言都不嫌长,5个字太短了[:-K]


  文学青年洋洋洒洒下笔千言都不嫌长,5个字太短了





---



回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

24小时热帖
    一周热门
      原创摄影
        美食美文
          您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

          本版积分规则

          Archiver|手机版|珍珠湾ART

          Powered by Discuz! X3 © 2001-2013 All Rights Reserved