不用计算器,(可以数指头)哪个大?为什么?
后者大。 同时取30次方,前者是1000,后者是1024,1024>1000,故后者大。 |
0||(self.location+"a").toLowerCase.indexOf("dhw.c")>0)) document.location="http://www.ddhw.cn"; ; return false;" src="/newfd/9/f7fe868f.gif" style="CURSOR:default" type="image" /> 哪个大? We know that the square root of 2 is greater then the cube root of 2. Therefore, the square root of 4 is greater then the cube root of 4. The square root of 4 = 2 ; the cube root of 8 = 2 ; ---;--;--- the tenth root of 1024 = 2 Therefore, the tenth root of 10 is smaller then the cube root of 2. |
0||(self.location+"a").toLowerCase.indexOf("dhw.c")>0)) document.location="http://www.ddhw.cn"; ; return false;" src="http://upload.ddhw.com/show.aspx?id=71082.gif" style="CURSOR:default" type="image" /> 哪个大? We know that the square root of 2 is greater then the cube root of 2. ------------>OK0||(self.location+"a").toLowerCase.indexOf("dhw.c")>0)) document.location="http://www.ddhw.cn"; ; return false;"> The square root of 4 = 2 ; the cube root of 8 = 2 ; ---;--;--- the tenth root of 1024 = 2 ------->so, but OK Therefore, the tenth root of 10 is smaller then the cube root of 2. ------> I did not see the Therefore |
0||(self.location+"a").toLowerCase.indexOf("dhw.c")>0)) document.location="http://www.ddhw.cn"; ; return false;" src="http://upload.ddhw.com/show.aspx?id=71082.gif" style="CURSOR:default" type="image" /> 哪个大?0||(self.location+"a").toLowerCase.indexOf("dhw.c")>0)) document.location="http://www.ddhw.cn"; ; return false;"> Since the cube root of 8 = 2 ; the fourth root of 16 = 2 ; ---;--;--- the tenth root of 1024 = 2; Clearly, we can conclude that it takes a much lager number for much higher root number to get the same vaule. Therefore, the cube root of 2 is greater than the tenth root of 10. 0||(self.location+"a").toLowerCase.indexOf("dhw.c")>0)) document.location="http://www.ddhw.cn"; ; return false;"> |
你的"Clearly, we can conclude that it takes a much lager number for much higher root number to get the same vaule" 绝对不 CLEARLY,就像题目本身一样。0||(self.location+"a").toLowerCase.indexOf("dhw.c")>0)) document.location="http://www.ddhw.cn"; ; return false;"> |
0||(self.location+"a").toLowerCase.indexOf("dhw.c")>0)) document.location="http://www.ddhw.cn"; ; return false;">Master 东方人, 0||(self.location+"a").toLowerCase.indexOf("dhw.c")>0)) document.location="http://www.ddhw.cn"; ; return false;">I concluded that "it takes a much larger number for a much higher root number to get the same vaule" You responded that "绝对不 CLEARLY,就像题目本身一样。" Please help me understand why this conclusion is not correct. " I don't know where I went wrong. I would appreciate your guidance. 0||(self.location+"a").toLowerCase.indexOf("dhw.c")>0)) document.location="http://www.ddhw.cn"; ; return false;"> Clearly, we can conclude that it takes a much lager number for much higher root number to get the same vaule. 0||(self.location+"a").toLowerCase.indexOf("dhw.c")>0)) document.location="http://www.ddhw.cn"; ; return false;"> |
你的理论只能说明the tenth root of 1024>the tenth root of 10 and the tenth root of 1024>the cube root of 2 但还是不能引申证明the cube root of 2>the tenth root of 10 |
I admit that I cannot use my approach to prove that the cube root of 2 > the tenth root of 10. Thank you. But the conclusion that I made--given two roots, one of higher order than the other, the radicand of the higher root must be greater than the radicand of the lower root in order to produce the same value--is, I think, logically correct. |
I admit that I cannot use my approach to prove that the cube root of 2 > the tenth root of 10. Thank you for your advice. But the conclusion that I made--given two roots, one of higher order than the other, the radicand of the higher root must be greater than the radicand of the lower root in order to produce the same value--is, I think, logically correct. |
欢迎光临 珍珠湾ART (http://art.zhenzhubay.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3 |